<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Attorney O&#039;s Midnight Musings:  Connecticut Law &#187; U.S. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/index.php/tag/u-s-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog</link>
	<description>Law Offices of Irene C. Olszewski, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Monday&#8217;s U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s 5-4 Decision Backs Individual Gun Rights</title>
		<link>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2010/06/30/mondays-u-s-supreme-courts-5-4-decision-backs-individual-gun-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2010/06/30/mondays-u-s-supreme-courts-5-4-decision-backs-individual-gun-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Bear Arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/?p=1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t have a chance to post this on Monday but I thought it was still worth mentioning for anyone who might have missed it.  
Excerpted from Politics Daily:
&#8220;The U.S. Supreme Court declared  Monday that individual gun rights under the Second Amendment apply and may be used to block enforcement of certain restrictive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have a chance to post this on Monday but I thought it was still worth mentioning for anyone who might have missed it.  </p>
<p>Excerpted from <strong><a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/">Politics Daily</a></strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The U.S. Supreme Court declared  Monday that individual gun rights under the Second Amendment apply and may be used to block enforcement of certain restrictive state and local gun control ordinances.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/070618_sacredright2.jpg" alt="The Right To Bare Arms" title="The Right To Bare Arms" width="250" height="282" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1422" /></p>
<p>Read:  <strong><a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-ruling-backs-individual-gun-rights/">Supreme Court Ruling Backs Individual Gun Rights</a></strong></p>
<p>Read:  <strong><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf">McDonald et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Read:  <strong><a href="http://www.guncite.com/journals/senrpt/fgd-guar.html"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution">Second Amendment to the United States Constitution</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2010/06/30/mondays-u-s-supreme-courts-5-4-decision-backs-individual-gun-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana Justice of the Peace Refuses to Issue Marriage License to Interracial Couple:  Loving v. Virginia Revisited?</title>
		<link>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2009/10/19/louisiana-justice-of-the-peace-refuses-to-issue-marriage-license-interracial-couple-loving-v-virginia-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2009/10/19/louisiana-justice-of-the-peace-refuses-to-issue-marriage-license-interracial-couple-loving-v-virginia-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interracial Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice of the Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loving v. Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case, Loving v. Virginia, the unanimous court decided that, &#8220;[u]nder our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.&#8221;
Apparently, Louisiana Justice of the Peace Keith Bardwell hasn’t been paying attention.  Bardwell, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/U.S.-Supreme-Court-150x150.jpg" alt="U.S. Supreme Court" title="U.S. Supreme Court" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" />In the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case, <strong><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#038;vol=388&#038;invol=1">Loving v. Virginia</a></strong>, the unanimous court decided that, &#8220;[u]nder our <strong><a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html">Constitution</a></strong>, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently, <strong><a href="http://www.louisiana.gov/">Louisiana</a></strong> Justice of the Peace Keith Bardwell hasn’t been paying attention.  Bardwell, who claims he is not a racist, recently refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple.  </p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="400" height="346" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/10032373001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=1612833736" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=45237555001&#038;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.aol.com%2Faolvideo%2FAOL+News%2Fjustice-who-denied-marriage-wont-resign%2F45237555001&#038;playerID=10032373001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/10032373001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=1612833736" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=45237555001&#038;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.aol.com%2Faolvideo%2FAOL+News%2Fjustice-who-denied-marriage-wont-resign%2F45237555001&#038;playerID=10032373001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="400" height="346" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>Read <strong><a href="http://news.aol.com/article/keith-bardwell-stands-by-refusal-to-wed/721998">Justice Stands by Refusal to Wed Couple</a></strong> on AOLnews.</p>
<p>[Source:  AOL News]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ireneolszewski.com/ctlawblog/2009/10/19/louisiana-justice-of-the-peace-refuses-to-issue-marriage-license-interracial-couple-loving-v-virginia-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.351 seconds -->

